Since updating to 10.4.11 CRX is failing to identify any spam at all. Anyone else had this happen?
Richard
Full Version: CRX and 10.4.11
Richard, CRX works fine on Leopard. 
This reads like you've got your installation goofed up, and are no longer using/have access to the databases that you were using in your previous installation.
This reads like you've got your installation goofed up, and are no longer using/have access to the databases that you were using in your previous installation.
Jeff,
When you say the 'installation goofed up' do you mean CRX or the OS?
Meanwhile I have replaced CRX, while keeping the data files, dumped the pref file from ~/Library, rebooted, and still it fails to ID spam.
When you say the 'installation goofed up' do you mean CRX or the OS?
Meanwhile I have replaced CRX, while keeping the data files, dumped the pref file from ~/Library, rebooted, and still it fails to ID spam.
What I mean is that if you have CRX installed properly, so that it can find its reference database files, that it works fine on Leopard. You are missing something.
If you turn logging on, CRX will tell you what in the file log.txt.
If you turn logging on, CRX will tell you what in the file log.txt.
Just another data point:
I upgraded to 10.4.11 yesterday and CRX does indeed seem to be identifying spam (I still get false positives, but no more than previously).
Jeff, I understand the optimism about Leopard but my venerable desktop is too old for a 10.5 install. I will no doubt address this someday soon, but I doubt I'm alone. For many of us 10.4.x will be required.
I upgraded to 10.4.11 yesterday and CRX does indeed seem to be identifying spam (I still get false positives, but no more than previously).
Jeff, I understand the optimism about Leopard but my venerable desktop is too old for a 10.5 install. I will no doubt address this someday soon, but I doubt I'm alone. For many of us 10.4.x will be required.
QUOTE (paulbel @ Dec 3 2007, 05:26 PM) 
Just another data point:
I upgraded to 10.4.11 yesterday and CRX does indeed seem to be identifying spam (I still get false positives, but no more than previously).
Jeff, I understand the optimism about Leopard but my venerable desktop is too old for a 10.5 install. I will no doubt address this someday soon, but I doubt I'm alone. For many of us 10.4.x will be required.
I upgraded to 10.4.11 yesterday and CRX does indeed seem to be identifying spam (I still get false positives, but no more than previously).
Jeff, I understand the optimism about Leopard but my venerable desktop is too old for a 10.5 install. I will no doubt address this someday soon, but I doubt I'm alone. For many of us 10.4.x will be required.
Wish I had stayed at 10.4 major problems including not being able to get mail from my business side through CRX, still working to get it fixed.
If you've copied all of the files from your CRX program folder to the new OS installation folder with similar read/write characteristics, then CRX should work exactly as it did on the old system. 
John, I'm almost certain that your receive problem is username/password related. Please double check this in both your email client, and CRX. Remember, in CRX IT checks your email from your server, but also insists that the password be the same if you do NOT have ignore login credentials checked in CRX.
John, I'm almost certain that your receive problem is username/password related. Please double check this in both your email client, and CRX. Remember, in CRX IT checks your email from your server, but also insists that the password be the same if you do NOT have ignore login credentials checked in CRX.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.