Hi all

Jeff has been graciously working with me on this, but I'd like to know if I'm the only user who is having about 1% or less of mail that EMCRX -should- have caught, get thru, only to be classified as junk by your email program.

I get about 1500 emails per day, and every now and then, one will make it thru that should not have, given the way I've got CRX set up.

We know what the problem is, (it's a weirdly formatted IP address in the From: header, like (1006@123.45.345.90 - there's an "@" just before the IP numbers).

But the point of my post is to see if anyone besides me is having junk, spam and/or bounces make it thru CRX and into your email client.

If so, would you check the full headers of those that do, and see if there's an "@" in the From: line?

Please post a reply here.

Thanks!

Thanks for working with me on this Tracy. I've just posted a version on the web site (same version number) at ~ 8:26pm EST that I hope will address this for you.

This version should correctly parse the received lines that look like this :

Thanks, Jeff. It's great working with you on this.

I've just posted of a direct email to you with some more thoughts on where this may be coming from.

Now, I'll go get the latest and greatest!

:-)

T

This happened once but I didn't log. Will log and report if it is repeats.

I'm delighted to say that Jeff has resolved this problem as well, and that if you've not recently downloaded the 1.5.6 update, you should do so again.

Nice work, Jeff!

Thanks for the update, and the help getting this sorted out Tracy!

There an example of one is one of a couple that manage to evade Mailprotect and Em@ilCRX

CRX is configured on the strictest setting






Return-Path: <awallacehmpy@islandtakes.com>
Received: from ****.shared.server-system.net (root@localhost)
by myserver.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0SBTtSE005525
for <steph@polysa.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:29:55 -0800
Received: from ***.shared.server-system.net (mail@localhost)
by ****.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id l0SBTj2N005398
for <me@myserver.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:29:45 -0800
X-ClientAddr: 86.39.33.55
Received: from 86-39-33-55.customer.fulladsl.be (86-39-33-55.customer.fulladsl.be [86.39.33.55])
by ****.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l0SBThhM005375
for <me@myserver.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:29:44 -0800
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 06:17:56 -0500
From: Alyson Milligan <awallacehmpy@islandtakes.com>
Reply-To: Alyson Milligan <awallacehmpy@islandtakes.com>
Message-ID: <559953730999.399606920128@islandtakes.com>
To: <me@myserver.com>
Subject: Welcome, Sun, 28 Jan 2007 06:17:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC--Metrics: ss07.shared.server-system.net 1367; Body=634 Fuz1=634
Fuz2=many
X-MailProtect-JunkCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=3.213, required 5,
autolearn=spam, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 3.21)
X-MailProtect-JunkScore: sss
X-MailProtect-From: awallacehmpy@islandtakes.com
Status:

hi
(download), start playing
1. most fair online casino
2. one of the biggest online casinos

http://thunderbayuta.org/casinopromo3636/

USA players are welcome

From a DNS perspective, this is a valid email.

I have the following entry in my blacklist settings that block these emails.

\bcasin(o|os)\b

Note the | is the character above the \ key.

thank you !