QUOTE
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from sdgworld.net ([172.16.10.6]) by Lando.sdgworld.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 06:34:40 +0100
Received: from mx1.exponential-e.com ([62.244.177.19]) by sdgworld.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 06:34:40 +0100
Received: from [201.8.74.118] (port=1992 helo=201008074118.user.veloxzone.com.br)
by mx1.exponential-e.com with smtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1BVOMq-0004Lt-2G
for b.freeman@sdgworld.net; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 05:32:49 +0000
Received: from 255.90.174.168 by web193.mail.msn.com; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:35:05 +0600
Message-ID: <TTNCQJHAJMPMBJWZEPDYHLPJ@msn.com>
From: "Clay Tyson" <Leal291@yahoo.com>
To: b.freeman@sdgworld.net
Subject: B.freeman less expensive & G~eneric: R~X
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:34:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--222335505202158"
X-CS-IP: 122.205.107.152
Return-Path: Sweeney677@yahoo.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2004 05:34:40.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[4CED9FA0:01C44863]
1.27 finds no reporting address.
1.26 finds abuse@telemar.net.br and mail-abuse@nic.br
Spamcop finds mail-abuse@nic.br
One thing I've found, sometimes it takes two passes for 1.27a to find a reporting address.
Bazz